logo Weezblog

Se connecter S'inscrire
total : 3825
aujourd'hui : 8

Commentaire

Pseudo:

Tout propos injurieux ou à caractère illégal sont interdits. Votre adresse IP est enregistrée afin de pouvoir vous identifier.

Article

A similar bill brought by the previous Left Front government in 2003 was faulty and incomplete and did not get Presidential assent. It provides for confiscation of property of the financial establishment or the promoter, partner, director, manager, member, employee or any other person responsible for its business affairs.. It also empowered entry of premises and inspection of documents.The West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, which was passed by the state Assembly following uproar over the Saradha chitfund scam, has been withdrawn after the finance ministry raised objections on a few points and sought clarification from the state government.West Bengal government has withdrawn a bill aimed at protecting interests of depositors from chit funds that was awaiting Presidential assent following objections from the Centre and promised to get back with a new one.“The West Bengal government conveyed to us that it would get back with a new legislation allaying all apprehensions and clarifications,” a senior official said. It was submitted to the Central government for Presidential assent.The three points on which clarifications were sought include widening of powers of special designated courts and that no court could grant anticipatory bail as well as a suggestion by the Centre for adding a new provision for compounding offences. The scam-ridden Saradha group is facing multi-agency probe for illegal raising of deposits from investors across West Bengal and some parts of northeast India.The bill formulated by the Trinamul Congress government was passed in the state Assembly on April 30 in a two-day special session, following the Saradha chitfund scam. The previous Left Front government did not withdraw the bill when it was returned in 2006, but chose to introduce another legislation on the similar subject in 2008, which was subsequently passed in the Assembly.The latest bill is more serious and stringent in nature. However, Industrial Profiles Company  this legislation was also not enacted.

Posté le 23/11/2020 à 03:33 par scaffftower